Mankind has always known a struggle between opposing world views. Think of the choice offered to Adam and Eve: stay in a sheltered partnership of law and order or venture into the unknown armed with your god-like wits. Many long years later, conservative vs liberal conflict can give balance to existence or cause bitter discord and separation.
People get ideas and beliefs from their families, from education, and from circumstances of childhood. As they enter into adult freedom and responsibility, these ideas may change. Remember the student demonstrations of the sixties? Many a former hippie has given up extremely liberal views as he or she matures, enters the workforce, and raises a family.
For instance, a person who got their first credit card in college and ran up significant debt during their twenties might have learned to control their money. Having learned that 'buy now pay later' can have serious consequences, they might take a dim view of politicians who vote for popular but costly programs that tip the public budget into the red.
Of course, liberals might see programs that cost a bundle as necessary for the common good. They feel that an able-bodied adult who is not working but staying home to care for small children merits public support. Actually, few disagree with that fact. The difference of opinion comes in the extent of aid. Fiscal conservatives say that an unwed mother should not receive aid if there is a biological father around who will or can be made to support their children.
The difference in viewpoint among politicians and constituencies causes political debate and sometimes unrest. Socialism calls for concentrating power and wealth in a central government which cares for the people. Conservatives tend to feel that a free enterprise system, where people are encouraged to work for wages and take care of themselves, is better. They also feel that a capitalistic country allows its citizens more personal freedom.
However, it is also true that many of the most desperately poor don't know what aid is available, and that social workers should explain what help can be given. It is difficult to keep benefits from attracting those who feel no shame in taking advantage of their government and their fellow citizens. It is also hard to know when a program is helping or hurting, if it takes away the incentive to be self-sufficient.
There are other areas besides economics where world views collide. The role of religion in education and public life, public school curriculum and standards, the definition of marriage, energy production, jobs, climate change, and health care are only a few of the reasons for furious debate.
Conservative vs liberal is probably never going to stop, as viewpoints tend to be very diverse. Although the constant back and forth may get tiring, the alternative - one viewpoint that silences all others - is scary. Think freedom vs tyranny and keep up the attempt to see both sides and seek satisfactory compromises.
People get ideas and beliefs from their families, from education, and from circumstances of childhood. As they enter into adult freedom and responsibility, these ideas may change. Remember the student demonstrations of the sixties? Many a former hippie has given up extremely liberal views as he or she matures, enters the workforce, and raises a family.
For instance, a person who got their first credit card in college and ran up significant debt during their twenties might have learned to control their money. Having learned that 'buy now pay later' can have serious consequences, they might take a dim view of politicians who vote for popular but costly programs that tip the public budget into the red.
Of course, liberals might see programs that cost a bundle as necessary for the common good. They feel that an able-bodied adult who is not working but staying home to care for small children merits public support. Actually, few disagree with that fact. The difference of opinion comes in the extent of aid. Fiscal conservatives say that an unwed mother should not receive aid if there is a biological father around who will or can be made to support their children.
The difference in viewpoint among politicians and constituencies causes political debate and sometimes unrest. Socialism calls for concentrating power and wealth in a central government which cares for the people. Conservatives tend to feel that a free enterprise system, where people are encouraged to work for wages and take care of themselves, is better. They also feel that a capitalistic country allows its citizens more personal freedom.
However, it is also true that many of the most desperately poor don't know what aid is available, and that social workers should explain what help can be given. It is difficult to keep benefits from attracting those who feel no shame in taking advantage of their government and their fellow citizens. It is also hard to know when a program is helping or hurting, if it takes away the incentive to be self-sufficient.
There are other areas besides economics where world views collide. The role of religion in education and public life, public school curriculum and standards, the definition of marriage, energy production, jobs, climate change, and health care are only a few of the reasons for furious debate.
Conservative vs liberal is probably never going to stop, as viewpoints tend to be very diverse. Although the constant back and forth may get tiring, the alternative - one viewpoint that silences all others - is scary. Think freedom vs tyranny and keep up the attempt to see both sides and seek satisfactory compromises.
About the Author:
Read up-to-the-minute news about conservative vs liberal as we reveal the truth right here on www.americas-moral-dilemma.com. Take the opportunity to check out this website now at http://www.americas-moral-dilemma.com.
0 التعليقات:
إرسال تعليق