Theories of evolution of mankind, animals and the universe have been the basis of scientists in trying to explain as to how life came into existence. Their views have not gone down well with religious people who believe in creation by God as stated in Genesis in the bible. This group believes God created everything in six days and rested on the seventh day. For this reason, a number of arguments against evolution theories have been advanced.
The idea of living things being evolved from non living things beats the logic. This assumption is not possible and there is no evidence to support such claims. For life to come into existence there has to be parents of different gender. The others are just theories with no sustaining evidence to support their claim. Most of them are word of mouth.
On the side of universe, they believe it formed on its own from deformed matter. The weight is thrown behind the force of gravity. The biblical version denotes otherwise where God spent six days to create everything and He rested on the seventh day. Just mere statements of unknown force called gravity are not sufficient enough to support these theories.
In this perspective, it is not logical for matters to pile up on their own into well formed and organized things. There has to be an intellectual force behind this and at this point, God comes into the picture. He is the creator of earth, sky and all that are in it as stated in the first book of the bible. The idea of gravitational force is unrealistic since with the passage of time, it should have declined in strength as of today.
Besides, everything that is undergoing change will always move from orderly to disorderly and not the other way round. Scientists believe in the other way round. The universe is still in transition. This is basically from an orderly state to deformation with the passage of time. There is no way that the vice-verse part could have resulted into an orderly and well shaped universe as these people say so.
The aspect of alteration is another base for their theories. This one says that human beings mutated from animals of the baboon family with the passage of time. This is not possible since mutation leads to formation of new generic matter; something similar to the original body and not totally different in any way. As of such the conclusion of this is that it is not viable and as already mentioned in the previous paragraphs, nothing can move from disorderly to that of orderly manner.
Cell division is another component where these scientists have based their arguments. For this to occur, a lot of time is needed since the entire process is very slow. Besides, the new bodies or cells formed are an imitation of the original matter and nothing different.
With all these in place, arguments against evolution theories have turned to be more realistic. There is clarity and all the available pieces of evidence point to the existence of intellectual being who was organized in coming up with the entire creation. All these are therefore the works of God.
The idea of living things being evolved from non living things beats the logic. This assumption is not possible and there is no evidence to support such claims. For life to come into existence there has to be parents of different gender. The others are just theories with no sustaining evidence to support their claim. Most of them are word of mouth.
On the side of universe, they believe it formed on its own from deformed matter. The weight is thrown behind the force of gravity. The biblical version denotes otherwise where God spent six days to create everything and He rested on the seventh day. Just mere statements of unknown force called gravity are not sufficient enough to support these theories.
In this perspective, it is not logical for matters to pile up on their own into well formed and organized things. There has to be an intellectual force behind this and at this point, God comes into the picture. He is the creator of earth, sky and all that are in it as stated in the first book of the bible. The idea of gravitational force is unrealistic since with the passage of time, it should have declined in strength as of today.
Besides, everything that is undergoing change will always move from orderly to disorderly and not the other way round. Scientists believe in the other way round. The universe is still in transition. This is basically from an orderly state to deformation with the passage of time. There is no way that the vice-verse part could have resulted into an orderly and well shaped universe as these people say so.
The aspect of alteration is another base for their theories. This one says that human beings mutated from animals of the baboon family with the passage of time. This is not possible since mutation leads to formation of new generic matter; something similar to the original body and not totally different in any way. As of such the conclusion of this is that it is not viable and as already mentioned in the previous paragraphs, nothing can move from disorderly to that of orderly manner.
Cell division is another component where these scientists have based their arguments. For this to occur, a lot of time is needed since the entire process is very slow. Besides, the new bodies or cells formed are an imitation of the original matter and nothing different.
With all these in place, arguments against evolution theories have turned to be more realistic. There is clarity and all the available pieces of evidence point to the existence of intellectual being who was organized in coming up with the entire creation. All these are therefore the works of God.
About the Author:
Read more about Probable Arguments Against Evolution Theories visiting our website.
0 التعليقات:
إرسال تعليق